Behind the scenes and away from public eye, a deal was struck. Profiting from public disinterest in the issue, Minister of Agriculture Akram Chehayeb approved a partial deforestation in the Jannah natural reserve for the purpose of erecting a dam in this location.

Environment Minister Mohammad Mashnouk made his objections known, citing multiple reasons that indicate why the site is unfit for the installation of a dam. He has called on Cabinet to review the decision on its construction.

The Jannah dam project was approved by the Hariri administration in 2009 as part of the tenth fold plan to build dams across Lebanon.

Construction began in March 2013 in Adonis valley, and was proposed under the pretext of alleviating the country’s water shortages.

The initiative came to a halt shortly thereafter partly due to the recommendation of the German Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, whose study of the concerned valley indicated that it is unfit to house a project of the sort.

Consequently, the opinion of Khatib & Alami, Artelia and Safege, a French company, was solicited. The latter’s conclusions were initially anything but encouraging, but after correspondence with the Ministry of Energy, the company gave its approval only after expressing reservations. Work resumed but not without interruption.

According to reports, the dam’s capacity is expected to be 38 million cubic meters and the mobile storage is estimated at 90 million cubic meters of water.

Today the project is being championed by the Free Patriotic Movement, and its biggest objector is the Ministry of Environment, backed by the Prime Minister and various other parties.

If successful, the project would be a great stride towards supplying sufficient water and power to populations who are arguably less fortunate than capital dwellers.

If it fails the consequences will be dire.

Let us examine the two scenarios.

Advantages if faultlessly executed:

Green Energy and water sufficiency:

As part of a water strategy heralded by the Ministry of Energy and Water that includes 55 infrastructure projects to be contracted by 2020, the prospective dam is expected to supply 700,000 people in Jbeil and Beirut with drinking water, as well as supplying Jbeil and Kesrouan with agricultural water. According to FPM MP Hikmat Deeb, the dam could provide water to 3 million people. The energy output is expected to be 4 megawatts.

In a recent press statement, Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil cited the benefits of the dam. The numbers in his statement differ greatly from previous assessments. According to the man who acted as Energy Minister when the proposal to build the dam was approved, the energy that would be produced would greatly exceed the previously estimated 4 megawatts, to reach 100 megawatts. Furthermore Beirut would benefit from 30 million cubic meters of water, while Jbeil would receive 8 million cubic meters.

Among all the energy producing and water distributing initiatives available to the nation, the construction of a dam, in theory, is by far the most sustainable. The power station output in regards to carbon emissions is limited to the energetic cost of producing the turbines themselves, and the retention of a large body of water during rain season for later use is an ancient technique, which has yet to fail.

Tourism boost:

Other dams have become attractive locations for the exercise of water sports as well as for the cultivation of certain fish. A similar fate is predicted for Jannah, according to its advocators.

Disadvantages if it fails:

The rupturing of a dam is admittedly a rare occurrence. Very few dams in the world have failed so catastrophically so as to release the water that they contain, but every time it has happened, the results were dramatic. A total failure of the dam wall would result in the flooding of the valley that lies before it, annihilating fauna, flora, historical sites, and residences within.

The Potential Failure Mode Analysis of the Jannah Dam, as presented by Gicome, a consulting firm, identifies seismic loading and flood overtopping as the main potential failure modes. The Gicome study also predicts that the dam will leak an estimated 35 to 53 percent of its load.

Why the dam is controversial:

Geologically speaking:

A fault line traverses the location on which the dam is to be constructed. According to Environmentalist Paul Abi Rached, 3 branch-lines surround the location where the dam wall is set to be built, which greatly increases the possibility of catastrophic failure if an earthquake occurs.

Geologists have also warned that the area’s composition consists of carbonates, which form karst, or karst containers. The latter are a type of fractured rocks that melt in the rain and create caves. Karsts, as a geological structure, do not make for suitable conditions when it comes to dam construction. An example of this can be seen in the Brisa dam whereby vertical leakages resulted in an obsolete structure that holds no water. Brisa took 12 years to build and did not hold a single drop of water.

Environmentally speaking:

Although the price in fiscal terms has been estimated at $42 million per annum, the true environmental cost can not be measured in any currency. The region is home to 70% of the local biodiversity. It is by far the richest environmental site in the Middle East. There are 404 species of flora, 739 species of invertebrates, 32 of mammals, 140 of birds, and 6 of amphibians. The dam will not only bring about extensive deforestation [anywhere between 51,000 and 1 million trees], but also endanger the above-mentioned fauna and flora, destabilizing the precarious natural balance of surrounding regions.

51,000 trees means 51,000,000 KG of CO2 will not be absorbed, according to the AUB conservation center (NCC) bulletin. It also means loss of habitat to countless of species, the destabilization of an ecosystem, and the dismantling of a weapon that can be used in the fight against climate change.

On a historical note:

Long before the establishment of our nation, ancient civilizations, including the Phoenicians and the Romans, had revered this location sufficiently to erect both infrastructural constructions and religious sites throughout the valley. The remnants of these ancient empires are collectively owned and irreplaceable. They are part of our patrimonial heritage. The potential construction site is expected to span the area containing these structures. Methods of disposal and conservation have yet to be disclosed.

Let’s talk money:

The estimated net cost of construction stands at $1 billion according to Paul Abi Rached. $80 million have been paid so far in national appropriations of private lands, studies, and the execution of the first phase.

-Price of delay: In case our government is in breach of contract, the taxpayer is expected to carry a burden of around $100 million. This will not come out of our depleted treasury, but rather out of the pockets of the average citizen.

-Price of maintenance: Consecutive studies have affirmed that the site is unfit for a dam. The site lies above no less than 3 branch lines, and for lack of bedrock the soil that is to contain the water is composed of very absorbent karst. These issues are very likely to raise the cost of maintenance if the project goes through.

-Price in lost touristic revenue: Studies have shown that the retention of a large amount of water in this precise location is likely to influence the level of surrounding bodies of water, most eminent of which is the Jieta Grotto. The amount of revenue that will be lost is not yet estimated but judging from the complaints of Grotto management when other crises have forced it to shut down temporarily, we can assume that they are expected to be high.

The seasonal revenue from ecological tourism is hard to estimate but the construction of the dam will effectively annihilate surrounding touristic sites, which provide financial support to surrounding regions.

The final nail in the coffin:

The Brazilian company contracted with building the dam, Andrade Gutierrez, recently agreed to a plea deal with federal prosecutors for its alleged role in a massive corruption scandal centered on state oil company Petrobras. Andrade Gutierrez is one of dozens of construction companies under investigation for their alleged roles in corruption scandals.

The company in question is a member of the construction consortium of another highly controversial dam in the Amazon rainforest: the Belo Monte.

Alternative solutions:

Although Lebanon has 10 billion cubic meters of water in rainfall and snow, 1.3 billion of which is surface water, including rivers, springs and lakes, it suffers an annual water deficit of 425 million cubic meters.

The volume of underground water, which leaks through karsts to form a renewable water reserve, is estimated at about 3 billion [cubic meters]. If we do not use this water, it will go to the sea.

Alternatively, the project may be substituted by a cluster of smaller dams that do not exceed the price tag of $100 million, posing a lesser threat to the environment, if Paul Abi Rached’s assertions are correct.


I cannot believe that for the fist time in many years, I am siding with the Environment Minister, a man who has become synonymous with Lebanon’s incapacity to resolve the garbage crisis. I agree with him solely due to his current stance on this very issue. If he is revealed to be politically motivated, as the FPM suggests, then he deserves no credit for having held an accurate stance.

If supporters of the dam intend to champion their position they must endeavor to do so by making all the information available to the public. They should also explain how the studies that support the dam are more legitimate than equally substantial studies that imply the opposite. This issue should not be seen as an opportunity for a political tug of war.

Attachment to the environment should not be dismissed as mere sentimental fancy. Our quality of life is intrinsically linked with the extent and the health of the natural landscape. The issue of natural conservation should not be wielded as a political weapon against the opposing party. The environment will not withstand being used as a political prop on which the indifferent members of the ruling class bicker irresponsibly for the purpose of marking points in an endless political game where participants profit and spectators suffer. The environment is our home.

Update 1: Construction works at Jannah dam have been temporarily suspended pending final decision. For more details click on this link.

Update 2: Construction works on Jannah dam ongoing despite order of cessation. For more details click on this link


Adonis River | Source: YouTube/RiseAboveLebanon
Adonis River | Source: YouTube/RiseAboveLebanon


22 thoughts on “Paradise Lost: Jannah flooded with Brazilian corruption and political infighting

  1. My compliments & my respect to all the parties who contributed in preparing & sharing this comprehensive excellent presentation about the project of Jannah Dam.
    I will personally support you & stand beside you in yr fight against its execution.
    Walid Husami
    Residing in Riyadh/ KSA

  2. What’s damning (no pun intended) is that water pricing is an ethical disgrace with anybody able to purchase a licence for an artesian well obtaining open bar access to an essential resource. Before dams, legislation and pricing.

  3. great article!!!
    thank you for this and i truly hope we can stop this madness!!!
    keep on.

  4. The environmental threat is enough to want to stop the construction, not to mention the lack of capabilities we have to faultlessly execute such a big project -which should end up in an environmental catastrophe- or the fact that I’m sure that whoever is pushing for the project is expecting to have their cousin/nephew/friend participate in its execution, and whoever is pushing back just wants to make sure that they’ll get a part of the pie, the article is not clear on what the issue is here. Is it the environment? Is it that the nature of t still he soil is not reassuring for the dam’s structure? Is it at this particular location? Should we not go after hydroelectric power? Is it corruption? Is it all of the above?

  5. That is a Biased article, Nadine failed to include what pros are saying about the project. Therefore your work is tainted. Next time Nadine, i suggest to be more objective not subjective and avoid taking one side or sides.

    Buttom line this is all about politics tit for tat. As we see the mafia club (Hariri berri and junblat) derail abd block any project in order to get a price tag or part of payback in other project. But the Dam will proceed otherwise no water or electricity for Beirut or other area.

      1. this is actually one of the few articles that truly put forth both pros and cons! and the most dangerous thing we could do is turn this into a political debate … this needs to be dealt with from a purely scientific approach … and the science is clear. Laura, pls take the time to read the research conducted. To date, there has not been any piece of evidence that backs this project’s claims of water & electricity. all hero-geological finds are clear on how improbable it is to harness the amounts of water needed for this project to achieve its objectives. Furthermore, there has not even been a EIA presented which by law is a prerequisite before commencing ANY works. on the other hand, there has been various alternatives proposed to this project … but the sad part is that no one is willing to listen and the greed machine is just mindlessly moving forward with potentially one of the gravest environmental disasters this country is yet to see. what a sad story this is.

    1. The article states clearly the pros and cons! I found it totally objective and that’s an opinion based on factual evidence which is the article itself! The blogger wrote a paragraph titled “Advantages if faultlessly executed” emphasizing on the “Green Energy and water sufficiency” matter. How could you miss a whole paragraph?

      Most probably it is a tit for tat, and there are mafia clubs all over the place, and no wonder that if the works stop, the people will pay the price in electricity and water thus pushing them to support the dam in return for these necessities. That’s how things are done in Lebanon, because our rulers know how we react in crisis, same thing happened in the garbage crisis. However, that doesn’t mean that we should not see things as they are and this article describes the situation subjectively in details.

  6. I have been browsing on-line more than 3 hours these
    days, yet I by no means discovered any fascinating article like yours.
    It is lovely worth sufficient for me. In my view, if all site owners and bloggers made excellent
    content as you did, the internet will be much more helpful than ever

  7. If this project goes further regardless of all the protests and movements, there should be strict accountability for every single person involved in case of failure.

    Bring every minister to justice. Force them to resign
    Sue every contractor. Say sorry to the people who saw it coming.

    Then, such things shall never occur again.

Comments are closed.

Next Post

Lebanon’s gun culture leaves more victims in its trail

Mon May 23 , 2016
Far from any semblance of conflict, children and innocent bystanders are falling victim to the arbitrary use of guns in both celebrations and funeral processions. […]